|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Educational Policy, Vol. 14, No. 1,
162-183 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904800014001013
Teaching for America's Future: National Commissions and Vested Interests in an Almost Profession
Linda Darling-Hammond
This article describes how the National Commission on Teaching has sought to implement its recommendations by working with partner states, districts, and stakeholder organizations that are committed to improving the quality of teaching. By creating a comprehensive agenda, democratizing the process of reform, and developing collaborative partnerships, the commission has stimulated substantial ongoing reform in policy and practice. As in the professionalization of medicine, law, and other fields, the creation of a professional accountability system for preparation and practice is a critical next step. If all teachers are to have access to knowledge and all students are to have access to well-prepared teachers, universities and schools will need to develop new partnerships and joint commitments to a democratic profession of teaching based on shared accountability for teacher education.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. B. Murray
On Building a Unified System of Accreditation in Teacher Education
Journal of Teacher Education,
September 1, 2005;
56(4):
307 - 317.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Cochran-Smith and M. K. Fries
Sticks, Stones, and Ideology: The Discourse of Reform in Teacher Education
Educational Researcher,
November 1, 2001;
30(8):
3 - 15.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Apple
Markets, Standards, Teaching, and Teacher Education
Journal of Teacher Education,
May 1, 2001;
52(3):
182 - 196.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. B. Murray
The Overreliance of Accreditors on Consensus Standards
Journal of Teacher Education,
May 1, 2001;
52(3):
211 - 222.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Malen
Generating Interest in Interest Groups
Educational Policy,
January 1, 2001;
15(1):
168 - 186.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|