This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schoenfeld, A. H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Math Wars

Graduate School of Education at the University of California, Berkeleyalans{at}socrates.berkeley.edu

During the 1990s, the teaching of mathematics became the subject of heated controversies known as the math wars. The immediate origins of the conflicts can be traced to the "reform" stimulated by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics’ Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Traditionalists fear that reform-oriented, "standards-based" curricula are superficial and undermine classical mathematical values; reformers claim that such curricula reflect a deeper, richer view of mathematics than the traditional curriculum. An historical perspective reveals that the underlying issues being contested—Is mathematics for the elite or for the masses? Are there tensions between "excellence" and "equity"? Should mathematics be seen as a democratizing force or as a vehicle for maintaining the status quo?—are more than a century old. This article describes the context and history, provides details on the current state, and offers suggestions regarding ways to findaproductive middle ground.

Key Words: math wars • mathematics curriculum • standards • mathematics reform

Educational Policy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 253-286 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904803260042


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Harwell, T. R. Post, A. Cutler, Y. Maeda, E. Anderson, K. W. Norman, and A. Medhanie The Preparation of Students From National Science Foundation-Funded and Commercially Developed High School Mathematics Curricula for Their First University Mathematics Course American Educational Research Journal, March 1, 2009; 46(1): 203 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Boaler When Politics Took the Place of Inquiry: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel's Review of Instructional Practices Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 588 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Roschelle, C. Singleton, N. Sabelli, R. Pea, and J. D. Bransford Mathematics Worth Knowing, Resources Worth Growing, Research Worth Noting: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report Educational Researcher, December 1, 2008; 37(9): 610 - 617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Freeman and L. Crawford Creating a Middle School Mathematics Curriculum for English-Language Learners Remedial and Special Education, February 1, 2008; 29(1): 9 - 19. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. S. Nasir, V. Hand, and E. V. Taylor Culture and Mathematics in School: Boundaries Between "Cultural" and "Domain" Knowledge in the Mathematics Classroom and Beyond Review of Research in Education, February 1, 2008; 32(1): 187 - 240. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Schoenfeld What Doesn't Work: The Challenge and Failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to Conduct Meaningful Reviews of Studies of Mathematics Curricula Educational Researcher, March 1, 2006; 35(2): 13 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Kauffman Variations on a theme: Implementation of the International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme Journal of Research in International Education, December 1, 2005; 4(3): 243 - 261. [Abstract] [PDF]