Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldring, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sims, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Modeling Creative and Courageous School Leadership Through District-Community-University Partnerships

Ellen Goldring

Alexander Heard Distinguished Service at Peabody College

Pearl Sims

Vanderbilt University’s Leadership Development Center and Department of Leadership, Policy and Organizations at Peabody College

This article examines the Principals Leadership Academy of Nashville (PLAN) to explore the question How do university-community-district partnerships develop as successful cooperative endeavors? Interviews conducted with key stakeholders are analyzed to study critical aspects of the partnership’s governance structure, guiding principles, and political decision-making processes. PLAN demonstrates that cooperative interorganizational relationships can take firm root and flourish under an innovative leadership structure that is grounded in principles of shared power and shared learning. Such a partnership requires strong commitment and leadership from three levels of leaders. Top-level leaders (the public school superintendent, the dean of the college of education, and key community leaders) must be highly visible in their support of the partnership. Frontline leaders must design and implement the partnership’s programs and must be champions within their respective organizations. Finally, the critical role of a bridge-building leader (boundary spanner)is discussed.

Key Words: professional development • school-university partnerships

Educational Policy, Vol. 19, No. 1, 223-249 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904804270777


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
P. M. Miller
Boundary Spanning in Homeless Children's Education: Notes From an Emergent Faculty Role in Pittsburgh
Educational Administration Quarterly, October 1, 2009; 45(4): 616 - 630.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
D. Archbald
Research Versus Problem Solving for the Education Leadership Doctoral Thesis: Implications for Form and Function
Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 2008; 44(5): 704 - 739.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
W. H. Sherman
Preserving the Status Quo or Renegotiating Leadership: Women's Experiences With a District-Based Aspiring Leaders Program
Educational Administration Quarterly, December 1, 2005; 41(5): 707 - 740.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
N. Cambron-McCabe and M. M. McCarthy
Educating School Leaders for Social Justice
Educational Policy, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 201 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]