This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0895904805284121v1 21/2/369    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Franz Coldren, A. Articles by Spillane, J. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Making Connections to Teaching Practice

The Role of Boundary Practices in Instructional Leadership

Northwestern University, amyc{at}northwestern.edu

James P. Spillane

Northwestern University

Administrators, particularly those who engage in instructional leadership, play a key role in school improvement. Past research describes the types of activities instructional leaders engage in but has paid little attention to how they do it. The authors use the case of one school to unpack instructional leadership as a practice, paying close attention to the tools that constitute that practice, the contextual factors that help to define it, and how it affects teaching. The authors find that two kinds of tools—boundary practices and boundary spanners—play a significant role in constituting instructional leadership practice. Contextual factors, including student and staff composition and leaders' values and beliefs, define instructional leadership practice in important ways. Finally, policy implications are discussed.

Key Words: instructional leadership • tools

This version was published on May 1, 2007

Educational Policy, Vol. 21, No. 2, 369-396 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904805284121


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?