Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0895904806289209v1
21/4/662    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christenson, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Reschly, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Consequences of High-Stakes Assessment for Students With and Without Disabilities

Sandra L. Christenson

University of Minnesota

Dawn M. Decker

Central Michigan University, pickl1dm{at}cmich.edu

Heidi L. Triezenberg

LaGrange Area Department of Special Education, LaGrange, Illinois

James E. Ysseldyke

University of Minnesota

Amy Reschly

University of South Carolina

This descriptive study examined school professionals' perspectives of the effects of high-stakes assessment for students with and without disabilities. Participants were 249 general education teachers, special education teachers, and school psychologists from 99 schools across 19 states that have required high school exit exams. Participants completed a survey that examined their observations of the consequences of high-stakes assessment for students. Results suggested that school professionals perceived there to be a range in the effects of high-stakes assessment. Participants' responses indicated that a number of consequences have increased in frequency as a result of implementing high-stakes assessments. Many of the items that respondents indicated have increased were related to improving school and student performance. Less frequently, participants also indicated that some consequences have not changed in frequency or have decreased in frequency as a result of implementing high-stakes assessments.

Key Words: consequences • high-stakes assessment

This version was published on September 1, 2007

Educational Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, 662-690 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904806289209


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
D. M. Decker and S. E. Bolt
Challenges and Opportunities for Promoting Student Achievement Through Large-Scale Assessment Results: Research, Reflections, and Future Directions
Assessment for Effective Intervention, December 1, 2008; 34(1): 43 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]