Educational Policy

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click Here for More Information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Educational Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, 106-129 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904807311299

Fear and the Preparation of School Leaders

The Role of Ambiguity, Anxiety, and Power in Meaning Making

Michelle D. Young

University of Texas at Austin

Curtis Brewer

University of Texas at Austin

An uncertainty has developed around the "core technology" of preparing educational leaders, making the general public question whether, in particular, university professors know what they are doing. This sense of ambiguity can also be found within the professoriate, where questioning of the knowledge base, standards, pedagogy, and university expectations have become a new norm, promoting reflexivity, uncertainty, and fear. Such uncertainty is neither healthy nor unhealthy in and of itself; the outcome depends in large degree on how it is fostered. In this article, we examine two contemporary reports that critique educational leadership preparation, viewing their critiques and recommendations as exercises of power within the context of late modernity. Using Nyberg's (1981) work on modes of power, Fraser's (1989) work on problem definition and contemporary work on the politics of fear (e.g., Glassner, 1999; Gonzalez & Delgado, 2006), we analyze the content of the reports and their impact.

Key Words: leadership preparation • late modernity • educational context • social construction of meaning • power


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?