Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Policy
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

"... the silent compulsions of economic relations": Markets and the Demand for Education

David Hogan

Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104

Some recent analyses have argued that public education in the United States has been isolated from market processes and pressures, that the institutional environment of public education has been dominated by democratic politics and centralized bureaucracies, and that the key to the reform of public education lies in the exposure ofpublic education to market pressures. This article suggests that market forces shape the demand for, and the politics of, American education. It also suggests that, to the extent that market pressures and processes have shaped the institutional environment of American education, market processes and pressures have to bear a substantial amount of the responsibility for the condition of American schools and the problems that afflict them.

Educational Policy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 180-205 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904892006002006


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational Administration QuarterlyHome page
C. A. Lugg
Sissies, Faggots, Lezzies, and Dykes: Gender, Sexual Orientation, and a New Politics of Education?
Educational Administration Quarterly, February 1, 2003; 39(1): 95 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
S. J. Berkhout and W. Wielemans
Toward Understanding Education Policy: An Integrative Approach
Educational Policy, July 1, 1999; 13(3): 402 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
D. F. Labaree
Public Goods, Private Goods: The American Struggle Over Educational Goals
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1997; 34(1): 39 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational PolicyHome page
F. Margonis and L. Parker
Choice, Privatization, and Unspoken Strategies of Containment
Educational Policy, December 1, 1995; 9(4): 375 - 403.
[Abstract]