Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Educational Policy
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Malley Borg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stranahan, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Plenty of Children Left Behind

High-Stakes Testing and Graduation Rates in Duval County, Florida

Mary O'Malley Borg

University of North Florida

J. Patrick Plumlee

University of North Florida

Harriet A. Stranahan

University of North Florida

The Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) is a high-stakes test that public school students must pass to be eligible for graduation from high school. Previous research suggests that high-stakes tests have a differential effect on students by race and ethnicity. This study finds that in one Florida school district African American and Hispanic students coming from poorer, less educated, or higher mobility households are less likely to meet graduation requirements than their higher socioeconomic, White, suburban counterparts. African American students and students from the lowest income households are also the most likely to encounter a negative graduation effect because the passing score on the FCAT rises each year. School characteristics also affect the probability of student success. High schools that hire more teachers with advanced degrees or offer a magnet program have better student FCAT scores. This results in higher probabilities that all categories of students will meet graduation requirements.

Key Words: Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test • high-stakes testing • minority students

References

  • Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2002a, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved August 2, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n18/
  • Amrein, A.L., & Berliner, D.C. (2002b). The impact of high-stakes tests on student achievement performance: An analysis of NAEP results in states with high-stakes tests and ACT, SAT, and AP test results in states with high school graduation exams. Tempe, AZ: Educational Policy Research Unit, College of Education, Arizona State University.
  • Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305-332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Dahmus, T. (2003). The effects of No Child Left Behind Act on the balance of power among local, state, and federal educational authorities. LBJ Journal of Public Affairs, 16, 20-28.
  • Dee, T.S. (2003). The "first wave" of accountability. In P. E. Petersen & M. R. West, (Eds.), No child left behind? The politics and practice of accountability (pp. 215-241). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Garza, C. (2003, March 11). Many see time slipping away on FCAT. Florida Times-Union, pp. B1, B3.
  • Grech, D. (2002, May 23). FCAT failure rate is "scary": Many in S. Florida must retake the test. The Miami Herald, p. B1.
  • Greene, W.H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Haney, W. (2000, August 19). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41). Retrieved August 2, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/
  • Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2003a). Improving educational quality: How best to evaluate our schools? In Y. Kodrzycki (Ed.), Education in the 21st century: Meeting the challenges of a changing world (pp. 193-224). Boston, MA: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
  • Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2003b). Lessons about the design of state accountability. In P. E. Peterson & M. R. West (Eds.), No child left behind? The politics and practice of accountability (pp. 127-151). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Hanushek, E.A., & Raymond, M.E. (2004). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? (NBER Working Paper No. 10591). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved August 5, 2005, from http://ripolicyanalysis.org/SchoolAccountability.pdf
  • Jacob, B.A. (2001). Getting tough? The impact of mandatory high school graduation exams on student achievement and dropout rates. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 99-122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (Eds.). (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Lawmakers want FCAT alternative for students. (2003, April 6). Florida Times-Union, p. A20.
  • Mitchell, T. (2005, April 30). More than 1000 will lose their diplomas to FCAT. Florida Times-Union. Retrieved June 1, 2005, from http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/043005/met_18620079.shtml
  • Protesters want moratorium on this year's FCAT results. (2003, May 18). Florida Times-Union, p. B6.
  • Raymond, M.E., & Hanushek, E.A. (2004). Shopping for evidence against school accountability. In W. J. Fowler Jr. (Ed.), Developments in school finance: 2003. Fiscal proceedings from the annual State Data Conference of July 2003 (pp. 1-139). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved August 6, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004325.pdf
  • West, M.R., & Peterson, P.E. (2005, March 23). The efficacy of choice threats within school accountability systems: Results from legislatively induced experiments (Working Paper Number: RWP-05-032). Retrieved November 30, 2005, from http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf

This version was published on November 1, 2007

Educational Policy, Vol. 21, No. 5, 695-716 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0895904806289206


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Malley Borg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stranahan, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?